Digital Engineering and Data Management Hub for Integrated Combat Systems

THIS IS AN OPEN CALL FOR SOLUTIONS. This notice initiates a competitive process to identify and qualify solutions for inclusion in the CDAO Tradewinds Solutions Marketplace. This is not a Request for Proposal (RFP) and does not guarantee a contract award. However, the objective is to assess best-of-breed solutions from the pool of qualified respondents for the potential award of a prototype project under Other Transaction Authority (OTA). 1.0 SYNOPSIS The Department of the Navy, in support of the Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office (CDAO), is seeking qualified vendors to submit solutions for a critical Digital Engineering and Data Management challenge. The objective of this Special Topic is to identify viable solutions to address the problem detailed below. In Phase 1, if assessed favorably against the Tradewinds Solutions Marketplace Assessment Rubric and this notice, any such solutions will be entered into the CDAO Tradewinds Solutions Marketplace in a post competitive Awardable status. In Phase 2, any Awardable submissions received in response to this Special Topic may become eligible for further consideration for award of a prototype agreement for this Special Topic. The Government is seeking commercial capabilities to provide a centralized "Hub" digital environment to serve as the authoritative source for the Integrated Combat System (ICS) Program information. 2.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION PAE Mission Systems is responsible for the development and delivery of the Integrated Combat System (ICS) across the Surface Fleet portfolio. The overarching objective of the PAE is to align the organization, processes, and resources to develop a common and tailorable ICS. Achieving this alignment is intended to drive efficiency, increase the speed of delivery, and elevate the quality of the combat system across all ICS platforms. To support these rapid development and integration goals, the program utilizes modern digital infrastructure, including the U.S. Navy Forge Development Environment (FDE) and associated hardware factory. For further background information on the program office responsible for the requirements described by this Special Topic, please see the "PEO IWS X Program Overview and ICS Development Brief" located in the "Attachments/Links" section. 3.0 PROBLEM DESCRIPTION Despite the modernization goals of the ICS program, current data management practices limit operational efficiency. The ICS program currently manages critical technical information, program data, and system models across a disparate set of digital platforms and siloed performer applications. Vital program data is frequently delivered and trapped in static, non-interactive legacy formats (such as PDF files). Because this critical information is fragmented and dispersed across multiple Original Equipment Manufacturing (OEM) suppliers and stakeholders, it cannot be efficiently accessed, correlated, or leveraged in real time. This disconnected approach restricts the Government's ability to perform dynamic analysis, ensure data integrity, and manage system configuration, ultimately limiting visibility, slowing integration, and increasing risk across the program lifecycle. To resolve these inefficiencies, the program urgently needs a centralized "Hub" digital environment to serve as the designated authoritative system of record for all ICS information. A solution is required to replace static data silos with an interactive, scalable environment that can ingest and transform multiple data sources into a dynamic, model-based ecosystem. This Hub will improve program oversight, accelerate development, and enhance lifecycle management. To ensure seamless collaboration, the solution must provide a defined access control framework in which permissions and user roles are managed and appropriate access rights to the digital environment are granted to all required Department of War (DoW) personnel and authorized DoW contractor support. 4.0 DESIRED SOLUTION CAPABILITIES Phase 1 of this Special Topic will leverage the Tradewinds Solutions Marketplace (TSM) to collect and assess solutions that address the above need. The TSM requires a video-based submission. For the content of the video submission, all submissions must adhere to the TSM guidelines and submission instructions (detailed within Section VII of the TSM Announcement available in the "Attachments/Links" section). As identified within the TSM Announcement, there are four required criteria that each video submission must address. Responses shall first identify the criteria associated with an explanation before providing the specific explanation of an approach to meet to any of the criteria. Responses shall detail the specific approach to meet the requirements included in the criteria. The Four criteria are: Defining the Problem: Responses shall explain how the vendor interprets and understands the problem description noted above. The explanation shall demonstrate this understanding, in particular the challenges described in the problem statement. Responses shall provide a general outline of how the vendor will solve the problem statement provide a summary overview of the vendor s approach in responding to Criteria 2-4 below. Accelerating the Mission: The sponsoring activity seeks a Data Hub solution that delivers a centralized, interactive, model-based environment to manage and visualize hardware and software configurations and associated technical data across multiple Navy platforms. The response must explain how the solution ingests and normalizes diverse data sources into a structured, searchable, and linked environment. The response must explain how the solution enables configuration management, including traceability and version control. Solutions should leverage commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) cloud-native products to the maximum extent practicable, minimizing customization, and maximizing automation for data ingestion, transformation, and integration. the degree of COTS utilization. It is required that the Data Hub solution interface with existing systems to ingest and exchange data streams across multiple data stores. It is required to provide program transparency through accessible, timely, and accurate program data. The response must therefore explain how the Data Hub solution delivers an interactive environment with both read/write and read-only access capabilities based on user roles. The response must explain how role-based access controls govern all access and data interactions, thus ensuring that the user has the appropriate visibility of data while protecting sensitive and proprietary information. The response must explain how the solution will handle both structured and unstructured digital data formats, including structured datasets and tables, unstructured content such as documents, as well as data streams and scanned or image-based inputs derived from non-digital sources. The response must explain how the solution ingests, imports, and processes a range of data types, including but not limited to PDFs, Microsoft Office files (Word, Excel), images, engineering drawings, and system generated data streams. Thus, the solution must support transformation of unstructured and scanned inputs into searchable and usable digital formats. The response must also demonstrate how the Data Hub solution permits configuration and version management capabilities of hardware, software, and system interface data, including both logical and physical configurations. Finally, the response must explain how the solution will permit extraction of data from the Hub to other Government systems. Advancing the State of the Art: Responses shall explain how the Data Hub solution serves as a single source-of-truth (in other words, a one-stop-shop ) for comprehensive data across US Navy s surface combat systems, supporting requiring activity customers & stakeholders (including internal requiring activity staff). The response shall explain how the solution manages data beyond core hardware and encompasses the full program lifecycle, including system and component specifications; configuration hardware, software, and firmware baselines; integrated product support and sustainment data (i.e. supply support, inventory, provisioning, maintenance planning, technical manuals, technical data, procedures, sustaining engineering, etc. Responses shall explain how the Data Hub solution will be integrated into the Government owned cloud environment, in particular, how the solution may be hosted in an Impact Level 5 and 6 (IL5 and IL6). The response shall explain how the solution permits both the extraction and import of data from the IL5 instance into IL6. Government teams will determine what content will be housed in the Data Hub solution. Therefore, the response shall explain how the Data Hub solution is intuitive, logically and pragmatically constructed, so users can easily navigate to the content contained within. The response…