100% ISBEE ,Firm Fixed Price, Non-personal, commercial service for Temporary CT/X-Ray Tech services at Cheyenne River Health Center in Eagle Butte, South Dakota.
Inactive on SAM.gov — responses were due 4 Sep 2026 · Indian Small Business Economic Enterprise · Indian Health Service (IHS), HHS · Eagle Butte, SD · NAICS 561320 · Solicitation 75H70626Q00205
Following NAICS 561320? Get new solicitations in it by email as they post — no account needed.
SAM.gov marked this notice inactive — responses were due 04 September 2026.
No award notice on SAM.gov yet. Not every award is posted there, so this does not mean it went unawarded.
Email me when the award is announced. One email, when SAM.gov posts the award notice. Not every award is posted there; if none appears within six months we'll tell you and stop. No account needed.
This one has closed. We'll email you when new NAICS 561320 (Temporary Help Services) solicitations post — the first email lists what is open right now, then at most once a week, only when something new posts. No account needed; unsubscribe in a click.
Description
This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with the format in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 12.6, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice, FAR Part 12, Acquisition of Commercial Items (Title VIII of the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994) (Public Law 103-355). This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; proposals are being requested and a written solicitation will not be issued. The Cheyenne River Health Center in Eagle Butte, South Dakota, Indian Health Service (IHS) intends to award a Firm-Fixed Price, Non-personal Commercial Service, Purchase Order, in response to Request for Quote (RFQ) 75H70626Q00205. This solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular 2025-03 01/08/2026. This RFQ is issued as 100% Indian Small Business Economic Enterprise (ISBEE) set-aside and the associated NAICS Code is 561320, which has a small business standard of $12.5 million. The quoted unit pricing must be all inclusive (to include but not be limited to travel, lodging, per diem, fringe benefits, federal, state and local taxes) plus all other costs pertinent to the performance of this contract. Utilize your most competitive and reasonable rates. CLIN 0001 Temp CT/X-Ray Tech See Performance Work Statement 1 year $____________ CLIN 0002 Temp CT/X-Ray Tech See Performance Work Statement 1 year $____________ CLIN 0003 Temp CT/X-Ray Tech See Performance Work Statement 1 year $____________ To provide CT/X-Ray Technologist services to support the mission of the Cheyenne River Health Center in Eagle Butte, South Dakota 57625. The period of performance will be 3 years from Date of Award. FAR 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors-Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Sep 2023)(DEVIATION NOV 2025). Quotes shall be submitted on company letterhead stationery, signed, dated and it shall include: Solicitation number RFQ 75H70626Q00205. Closing Date: August 26, 2026, at 12:00 pm CST. Name, address and telephone number of company and email address of contact person. Technical description of the item/service being offered in sufficient detail to evaluate compliance with the requirements of the solicitation. This may include product literature, or other documents, if necessary. Price and any discount terms. Remit to address, if different than mailing address. A completed copy of the representations and certifications at FAR 52.212-3 (see FAR 52.212-3(b) for those representations and certifications that the offeror shall complete electronically); Acknowledgment of Solicitation Amendments (if any issued). Past performance information, when included as an evaluation factor, to include recent and relevant contracts for the same or similar items and other references (including contract numbers, points of contact with telephone numbers and other relevant information). A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation. Offerors that fail to furnish required representations or information, or reject the terms and conditions of the solicitation may be excluded from consideration. Attachments: Performance Work Statement Provisions and Clauses incorporated by reference and full text HIS IEE Representation Form Wage Determinations SF 1449 Basis of Award is Best Value. Best Value award will be made to the responsible offeror whose quotation represents the best value to the Government, considering technical capability, past performance, and price. Technical Capability will be evaluated based on the offeror s demonstrated experience performing polysomnography sleep studies and home testing capabilities. Past performance will be evaluated based on relevant prior contracts of similar scope and complexity, particularly within healthcare of federal health agencies. Price will be evaluated for reasonableness and realism in relation to the technical approach. Best Value Determination: Technical factors (1-3), when combined, are more important that price. However, price will be considered in the overall best value determination and may become the deciding factor if quotations are determined to be technically equal. Technical Factor 1 Technical Capability (a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: Proposals, which merely offer a statement to conduct/provide services in accordance with the requirements in the Governments PWS, will not be eligible for award. The offeror must submit an explanation that identifies the vendor and staff experience in providing pharmacy services in hospital/clinic settings; professional licensure and certifications; compliance with regulatory requirements. (b) Basis of Evaluation: This factor will be evaluated as ACCEPTABLE if the explanation meets the requirement for qualifications and experience capabilities and responsibilities to meet the following: Tour of Duty/Schedule, Description of Services, Contractor Responsibility and Personnel Requirements, which comply with the requirements outlined above, are submitted. If an explanation of one or more of the following: Tour of Duty/Schedule, Description of Services, Contractor Responsibility and Personnel Requirements and/or do not comply with the requirements, this factor will receive an UNACCEPTABLE rating. Technical Factor 2 Past Performance (a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: Offerors do not need to provide any information under this factor as the US Government will base the evaluation on all INTERIM and FINAL Contractor Performance Assessment Reports (CPARs) that are recent and relevant. The CPARs will be retrieved from official US Government sources, including, but not limited to, the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System and the Past Performance Information Retrieval System. (b) Basis of Evaluation: Recency: For the purposes of this solicitation, a past performance record is recent if the CPAR final date of assessment listed in the Period of Performance Being Assessed block is within the 24-month period preceding the proposal due date. Relevancy: For the purposes of this solicitation, a past performance record is relevant if the CPAR business sector is listed as Services . In order to receive an "acceptable" rating for this factor, an Offer's recent and relevant CPARs must NOT include one or more INTERIM and/or FINAL CPARs with a rating of "UNSATISFACTORY" in one or more categories OR one or more INTERIM and/or FINAL CPARs with a rating of "MARGINAL" in two or more categories. If an Offeror has one or more CPARs with a rating of "UNSATISFACTORY" in one or more categories OR one or more CPARs with a rating of "MARGINAL" in two or more categories, the Offeror's past performance will be evaluated as "UNACCEPTABLE". In the case of an Offeror without a record of recent and relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Therefore, the Offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, unknown shall be considered acceptable. An UNACCEPTABLE rating for a single factor will result in the Offeror s entire proposal being rated UNACCEPTABLE . Factor 3 Price (a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: Completed Price Schedule Sheet (b) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the total proposed price calculated as the sum of bid item 0001 Base Year, item 0002 Option Period 1, item 0003 Option Period 2 that includes Contract cost, Subcontractor cost, Overhead and Profit. Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price: (i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP. (ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGE. (iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information. Note: A price that is found to be either unreasonable high or unrealistically low in relation to the proposed work may be indicative of an inherent lack of understanding of the solicitation requirements and may result in the overall proposal being considered unacceptable. FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Nov 2021). (a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers: Technical Capability, Past Performance, and Price Technical and past performance, when combined, are less important than price (b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may…
Version history
SAM.gov has posted 2 notices under solicitation 75H70626Q00205, oldest first.
FedSift reads the full solicitation package — every attachment — and pre-extracts the compliance matrix, evaluation factors, key risks, win themes and deal-breakers, each with a verbatim quote and the exact PDF page it came from. It scores the opportunity against your company profile, tells you whether to bid as prime or sub, and ranks teaming partners who could close your gaps.
Source: this notice on SAM.gov. FedSift republishes public federal procurement data and is not affiliated with the U.S. Government. Always confirm dates and requirements against SAM.gov before responding.
