Feasibility of Electronic-Only Submissions for Financial Guarantees in the European Theater

1. BACKGROUND AND STRATEGIC INTENT The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Europe District (NAU) is currently evaluating a permanent transition "from physical (wet signature) bank letters of guarantees and assurances to electronic-only submissions". Historically, the agency has relied on physical, wet-signed, and often sealed documents to secure bank letters of guarantee, bid bonds, and assurances. However, the agency notes that maintaining a physical-only posture introduces administrative delays, introduces pervasive package mishandling/storage abuses, and ignores modern security. Federal regulations currently support this modernization: Class Deviation 2020-O0016: This DoD policy "explicitly permits the use of electronic signatures and states they 'shall be considered original signatures and dates'" (Information Paper, Section 2). Furthermore, a subsequent 2023 memorandum "confirmed that Class Deviation 2020-O0016 is not being rescinded". Judicial Precedent: The Court of Federal Claims in Togiak Management Services, LLC v. United States ruled that it is "irrational to reject a guarantee solely because it is a photocopy rather than a wet signature," validating that "electronic formats are not inherently less secure than physical documents". FAR Case 2021-001: A pending, government-wide regulation update whose stated objective is to "institutionalize flexibilities regarding 'notarization, original documents, seals, and signatures using digital and virtual technology'". 2. PURPOSE OF THIS SPECIAL NOTICE While this transition is legally defensible and aligned with the permanent trajectory of federal contracting within the U.S. Government, USACE NAU is seeking input from our European theater partners (contractors, sureties, and financial institutions). Specifically, we are investigating whether the provision of a digital-only, electronic signature is feasible in your specific jurisdiction. 4. REQUESTED INFORMATION USACE NAU requests feedback identifying any "hard" impairments to this digital-only mandate. We are not seeking information on general convenience or administrative preference. Please provide responses to the following: Are there any national laws, banking regulations, or other formal strictures in your jurisdiction that strictly prohibit the issuance or enforcement of a digital-only bank letter of guarantee, assurance, or bid bond? If so, provide specific legal or regulatory citation and text. If physical (wet) signatures or embossed seals are legally mandated in your jurisdiction for these specific financial instruments, please provide the specific legal or regulatory citation and text. Any other helpful information you can offer.